Thursday, October 12, 2006

R-21 Pope says he condemns use of religion for hate.... Yet Religious leaders spread Hatred....

Pope condemns use of religion for hate
Pope Benedict XVI met Thursday with representatives of a Jewish group and said that religion should never be used to justify hatred and violence......The comments came a month after Benedict's speech at a German university sparked anger in the Muslim world when he quoted a medieval text that characterized some of the Prophet Muhammad's teachings as "evil and inhuman" and called Islam a religion spread by the sword......The aim of such dialogue, he said earlier in the speech, is "to build relationships not just of tolerance but of authentic respect."

Abraham Foxman, national director of the ADL, said his group supports Benedict's desire for honest interfaith dialogue, particularly when it comes to relations with Muslims....."If we really feel our faith is the only one that is right, how can we still have dialogue? The answer is that we must believe we have a truth, not the truth. As long as we believe that we can respect other truths," Foxman told The Associated Press in a telephone interview after the meeting. "This is the dialogue we need to have, both Jews and Christians, with the Muslims."

************************ Says a me Comments ****************************************
Defination: tol·er·ance (tol'?r-?ns)
1) The capacity for or the practice of recognizing and respecting the beliefs or practices of others.
2) Leeway for variation from a standard.
3) The permissible deviation from a specified value of a structural dimension, often expressed as a percent.
4) The capacity to endure hardship or pain.

The Popes comment on tolerance is used to confuse, befuddle, deny and cover up what is really not accepted or tolerated. If one already had these qualities that they profess they have....... then why must they make it a conscious effort to practice them... they should be as natural as breathing... Saying you have tolerance and respect doesn't mean that you have... it just means that you want the other person to believe that you have these qualities... The real agenda behind the lie is that you want them to accept your lies and denials as truth... Because if they accept them, then they give up their power, because they know you're a liar, but since they give you the benefit of the doubt, they also give up their their truth, their power...

Foxman's comment, "If we really feel our faith is the only one that is right, how can we still have dialogue?" is also a load of crap... Think about it... If what he was saying was the truth.... then what he's actually saying is that reason he is open to having a dialogue is because he believes that HIS faith is NOT right.... but he twists it around to make it sound like he is open, when in fact... he isn't... Exploring anothers religions beliefs and accepting them as his truth, is NOT part of his hidden agenda

Also note the comment by Foxman, "This is the dialogue we need to have, both Jews and Christians, with the Muslims." It might not be obvious to you... but to me, there is a subtle power play at work... The KEYWORD that leaves no doubt about his intent is the word "both"...refering to "Jew and Christians"....vs "the Muslims"...

AND the Pope says he condems the use of religion for hate!!!!! Give me a break!!! He uses religion to spread hate!!!.

And.. what's also interesting is that to these people that are twisting the truth, are also actually telling the truth, or rather a part truth... They're not saying that it's "in" love... they're saying that it's "in the name of" love. It's all meant to confuse, because if you're confused.. you're also easily controlled and manipulated... and kept in the dark.... ignorant....

It's all word games... and a sham... but to the ignorant, who don't know the difference between "sheep shit" and "chip dip"... they eat this crap up....and not only do they say it's "good"... but... then they also pass it on to get others to eat it... in the name of love.... KEYWORDS... "in the name of"... not "in" love... but "in the name of" love... which really isn't love... it's just using the words to get others to think that it is something that it is not...

Other examples of WORD games; in the name of, in the style of, in the image of, in the likeness of, the same as, similar, like, looks like, sounds like, tastes like, smells like, feels like, etc. They are not the original, but copies, imitations, clones.. Tastes like Coke... but it's Pepsi.... "Looks and feels like leather...'s not leather."

Saysame JR


Post a Comment

<< Home